×
Well done. You've clicked the tower. This would actually achieve something if you had logged in first. Use the key for that. The name takes you home. This is where all the applicables sit. And you can't apply any changes to my site unless you are logged in.

Our policy is best summarized as "we don't care about _you_, we care about _them_", no emails, so no forgetting your password. You have no rights. It's like you don't even exist. If you publish material, I reserve the right to remove it, or use it myself.

Don't impersonate. Don't name someone involuntarily. You can lose everything if you cross the line, and no, I won't cancel your automatic payments first, so you'll have to do it the hard way. See how serious this sounds? That's how serious you're meant to take these.

×
Register


Required. 150 characters or fewer. Letters, digits and @/./+/-/_ only.
  • Your password can’t be too similar to your other personal information.
  • Your password must contain at least 8 characters.
  • Your password can’t be a commonly used password.
  • Your password can’t be entirely numeric.

Enter the same password as before, for verification.
Login

Grow A Dic
Define A Word
Make Space
Set Task
Mark Post
Apply Votestyle
Create Votes
(From: saved spaces)
Exclude Votes
Apply Dic
Exclude Dic

Click here to flash read.

arXiv:2306.04550v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: We derive optimal rates of convergence in the supremum norm for estimating the H\"older-smooth mean function of a stochastic process which is repeatedly and discretely observed with additional errors at fixed, multivariate, synchronous design points, the typical scenario for machine recorded functional data. Similarly to the optimal rates in $L_2$ obtained in \citet{cai2011optimal}, for sparse design a discretization term dominates, while in the dense case the parametric $\sqrt n$ rate can be achieved as if the $n$ processes were continuously observed without errors. The supremum norm is of practical interest since it corresponds to the visualization of the estimation error, and forms the basis for the construction uniform confidence bands. We show that in contrast to the analysis in $L_2$, there is an intermediate regime between the sparse and dense cases dominated by the contribution of the observation errors. Furthermore, under the supremum norm interpolation estimators which suffice in $L_2$ turn out to be sub-optimal in the dense setting, which helps to explain their poor empirical performance. In contrast to previous contributions involving the supremum norm, we discuss optimality even in the multivariate setting, and for dense design obtain the $\sqrt n$ rate of convergence without additional logarithmic factors. We also obtain a central limit theorem in the supremum norm, and provide simulations and real data applications to illustrate our results.

Click here to read this post out
ID: 844921; Unique Viewers: 0
Unique Voters: 0
Total Votes: 0
Votes:
Latest Change: May 9, 2024, 7:32 a.m. Changes:
Dictionaries:
Words:
Spaces:
Views: 16
CC:
No creative common's license
Comments: